All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The Lupus Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lupus Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lupus Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lupus Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Autolus and Biogen. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Belimumab + MMF in patients with LN: BLISS-LN trial post hoc analysis

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Aug 18, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in lupus nephritis.


Results from a post hoc analysis of the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III BLISS-LN trial (NCT01639339) were published in Kidney International by Furie et al. The study investigated kidney outcomes with belimumab vs placebo in 272 patients with proliferative (Class III or IV) or proliferative plus membranous (Class III or IV with/without Class V) lupus nephritis (LN) who received mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as standard therapy. The primary outcome was complete renal response (CRR) at Week 104.

Key data: At Week 104, CRR was achieved by 32.6% vs 17.6% of patients receiving belimumab vs placebo (odds ratio [OR], 2.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23–3.99), regardless of baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The primary efficacy renal response (PERR) rates (46.7% vs 31.6%; OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.07–2.99), proportion of urine protein/creatinine ratio (uPCR) <0.5 g/g responders (41.5% vs 26.5%; OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.09–3.12), and mean change from baseline in eGFR (10.8 mL/min/1.73m2 vs 3.7 mL/min/1.73m2) were greater in the belimumab vs placebo group. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar between the belimumab and placebo groups, though fewer serious AEs (SAEs) were reported with belimumab vs placebo (23.7% vs 32.8%).

Key learning: Belimumab provides greater kidney outcome benefits and a favorable safety profile compared with placebo in patients with Class III or IV (±V) LN receiving MMF-based standard therapy, supporting the use of belimumab in this patient population. Further, this combination reflects current guidelines for LN, which recommend early use of an advanced therapy alongside glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content