All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The Lupus Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lupus Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lupus Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lupus Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through sponsorship from Autolus and Biogen. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Low-dose IL-2 for active SLE: Phase IIb study results

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

May 14, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in systemic lupus erythematosus.


Results from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial (NCT04077684), evaluating low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) in 152 patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), were published in Nature Communications by Zhang et al. Study participants were randomized to receive subcutaneous (SC) IL-2 (0.2, 0.5, or 1.0 million international units [MIU]) or placebo every other day for 12 weeks, then weekly for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) response rate at Week 12. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS); change from baseline in SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score, physician’s global assessment (PGA) score, and glucocorticoid dose; immune responses; and safety at Weeks 12 and 24. 

Key data: At Week 12, SRI-4 response rates were significantly greater in the 1.0 MIU (69.7%) and 0.5 MIU (64.7%) groups vs placebo (23.5%; both p < 0.001). The proportion of patients achieving LLDAS at Week 12 was greater in the 1.0 MIU (27.3%; p = 0.005) and 0.5 MIU groups (20.6%; p = 0.024) vs placebo (2.9%). A greater reduction in PGA scores was observed at Week 12 in the 1.0 MIU (p = 0.001) and 0.5 MIU (p < 0.001) groups vs placebo. Significant reductions in SLEDAI score were observed in all IL-2 dose groups vs placebo. A significant reduction in corticosteroid dose was demonstrated in the 1.0 MIU group vs placebo at Week 12 (p = 0.041). All differences remained significant until Week 24. IL-2 led to increases in CD4+ T-cell counts and expansion of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in all dose groups. The most common treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) was injection site reaction. 

Key learning: Low-dose IL-2 provides clinically meaningful, dose-dependent disease control in active SLE, with 1.0 MIU delivering the greatest improvement in disease activity and steroid-sparing benefit; these findings require confirmation in phase III trials. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content