All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.
The Lupus Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lupus Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lupus Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lupus Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Autolus, Biogen and Biogen MA, Inc. and UCB. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View lupus content recommended for you
Results from the extended treatment period of Part A of the phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled AMETHYST (NCT05531565) trial evaluating litifilimab in adults with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) were presented by Joseph F. Merola at the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Congress 2026, September 30–October 3, 2026, Vienna, AT. Patients received litifilimab (n = 59) or placebo (n = 34) until Week 24. At Week 24, patients in the litifilimab group continued treatment, while those in the placebo group switched to litifilimab through Week 52. Week 24 results were reported previously, including attainment of the primary endpoint: achievement of a Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator’s Global Assessment-Revised (CLA-IGA-R) erythema score of 0 or 1 at Week 16. Here, response rates from Week 24 through Week 52 are summarized.
Key data: At Week 24, litifilimab demonstrated higher response rates of CLA-IGA-R erythema 0/1 (19.0% vs 4.2; p < 0.05), Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index 70% (CLASI-70; 21.7% vs 5.8%; p < 0.05), CLASI-50 (40.8% vs 21.0; p < 0.05), and CLASI-Activity score of 0–3 (CLASI-A 0–3; 16.3% vs 0.0%; p < 0.01) vs placebo. Patients continuing litifilimab showed sustained responses at Week 52 across CLA-IGA-R erythema 0/1 (27.2%), CLASI-70 (28.8%), CLASI-50 (46.0%), and CLASI-A 0–3 (16.7%). Among patients who switched from placebo to litifilimab, responses emerged within 4 weeks of switching, reaching 33.7%, 35.4%, 48.5%, and 22.2% at Week 52 for CLA-IGA-R erythema 0/1, CLASI-70, CLASI-50, and CLASI-A 0–3, respectively. From Weeks 24 to 52, 76.8% and 78.1% of patients in the continued litifilimab and placebo–litifilimab groups, respectively, experienced an adverse event (AE) of any grade, with serious AEs (SAEs) in 3.6% and 3.1% of patients, respectively.
Key learning: In Part A of the AMETHYST trial, litifilimab demonstrated progressive improvements in disease activity measures in patients with CLE over 52 weeks, including in those who switched from placebo to litifilimab at Week 24, with no new safety signals reported. These findings support continued investigation of litifilimab in this patient population.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.
Your opinion matters
In which area of SLE management would additional medical education be most valuable to support your clinical practice?