All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.
The Lupus Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lupus Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lupus Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lupus Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Autolus and Biogen. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View lupus content recommended for you
Results from Week 24 of Part A of the phase II/III AMETHYST (NCT05531565) trial evaluating litifilimab (n = 59) vs placebo (n = 34) in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) were presented by Joseph F. Merola at the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) 2026 Congress, June 3–6, 2026, London, UK. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved Cutaneous Lupus Activity Investigator’s Global Assessment-Revised (CLA-IGA-R) erythema 0–1 at Week 16.
Key data: The primary endpoint was met, with a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving litifilimab vs placebo achieving CLA-IGA-R erythema 0–1 (14.7% vs 2.9%; p<0.05) at Week 16, with efficacy maintained at Week 24 (19.0% vs 4.2%; p<0.05). Change from baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI)-activity (A) score was also significantly greater in patients receiving litifilimab vs placebo at both Week 16 (−43.4% vs −29.3%) and Week 24 (−45.1% vs −26.4%). Significantly more patients receiving litifilimab vs placebo achieved ≥50% reduction from baseline in CLASI (CLASI-50; 40.8% vs 21.0%) and ≥70% reduction from baseline in CLASI (CLASI-70; 21.7% vs 5.8%) at Week 24. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 20.3% vs 26.5% of patients and serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 6.8% vs 2.9% of patients.
Key learning: Litifilimab demonstrated greater levels of CLA-IGA-R erythema 0–1 attainment and greater improvements in CLASI responses at Week 24 vs placebo and was well tolerated in patients with CLE, with no new safety signals detected.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content