All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The Lupus Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lupus Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lupus Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lupus Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Autolus and Biogen. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Anifrolumab dose optimization for LN: Phase II TULIP-LN pharmacometric analysis

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Aug 11, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in lupus nephritis.


Results from a pharmacometric analysis of data from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II TULIP-LN trial (NCT02547922), investigating anifrolumab dosing regimens in patients with lupus nephritis (LN), were published in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics by Almquist et al. Pharmacokinetic (PK; n = 95) and urine protein–creatinine ratio (UPCR; n = 145) analyses were performed. The analyses investigated the impact of a prolonged intensified regimen of anifrolumab on drug exposure, 24-hour UPCR (UPCR24) responses, and patient dropout, thereby guiding dose selection for the ongoing phase III IRIS trial (NCT05138133) of anifrolumab in patients with LN.

Key data: A combined PK–UPCR24–dropout model revealed that each mg/mg reduction in UPCR24 resulted in a 21.0% decrease (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.9–23.0) in linear anifrolumab clearance. Patients with a higher UPCR (2.8 mg/mg vs 0.5 mg/mg) or lower drug exposure (no exposure [NE] vs 21.0 μg/mL) were more likely to discontinue anifrolumab treatment. Simulations demonstrated that only the proposed phase III regimen (6 × 900 mg every 4 weeks [Q4W], then 300 mg thereafter) achieved anifrolumab exposure non-inferior to non-renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), with 37% of patients achieving UPCR24 < 0.5 mg/mg at Week 52 and a reduced dropout rate of approximately one in nine patients. 

Key learning: Pharmacometric modeling of data from the TULIP-LN trial supported selection of a prolonged, intensified anifrolumab regimen (6 × 900 mg Q4W, then 300 mg thereafter) for the ongoing phase III IRIS trial, demonstrating that extended initial high-dose treatment optimizes drug exposure and proteinuria reduction in patients with LN.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content