All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
The lupus Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lupus Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lupus and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lupus Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through a grant from AstraZeneca. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lupus content recommended for you
The phase III TULIP long-term extension (TULIP-LTE) study (NCT02794285) was a 3-year randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled extension of the 1-year TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 trials of anifrolumab in patients with SLE. Changes in health-related quality of life were captured across multiple validated instruments in TULIP-LTE to establish the effects of anifrolumab treatment alongside standard therapy over a 4-year treatment period (n = 369). Findings were published by Strand et al. in Lancet Rheumatology.
|
Key learnings |
At Week 208, patient-reported improvements from baseline were numerically higher with anifrolumab vs placebo in SF-36v2 domains for bodily pain (LS mean difference: 5.9 [95% CI: −0.7 to 12.5]) and mental health (LS mean difference: 3.7 [95% CI: −1.2, 8.6]). |
In patients maintaining glucocorticoid doses ≤5.0 mg/day, the LS mean change from baseline in the SF-36v2 bodily pain domain was 13.9 with anifrolumab vs 6.2 with placebo (LS mean difference: 7.7 [95% CI: −1.9, 17.3]). |
SF-6D utility index scores were generally numerically greater with anifrolumab vs placebo with differences evident from Week 24 (LS mean difference: 0.013 [95% CI: −0.007, 0.032]) and maintained at Week 208 (0.016 [95% CI: −0.010, 0.042]). |
Patients with chronic, progressive diseases such as SLE benefit from therapies that address both disease activity and quality of life; these 4-year data provide new insights into the potential long-term impact of treatment and suggest that anifrolumab is an effective treatment option that can positively impact PROs beyond standard therapy alone. |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; LS, least squares; LTE, long-term extension; PRO, patient-reported outcome; SF-36v2, Short Form 36 Health Survey version 2; SF-6D, Short Form 6-Dimension SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content