All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lupus Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lupus Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lupus Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lupus Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lupus Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through a grant from AstraZeneca. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Lupus nephritis (LN) is a serious complication of systemic lupus erythematosus that contributes to increased morbidity and mortality. Tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor, is approved in Japan and other Asian countries for the treatment of LN. However, there is a lack of robust data on its long-term safety and efficacy as a maintenance therapy in LN.
Here, we summarize an article published by Takeuchi et al. in The Journal of Rheumatology that assessed the 10-year safety and efficacy of tacrolimus as maintenance therapy in Japanese patients with LN treated in real-world clinical practice.1
Figure 1. Incidence of ADRs and serious ADRs over 10 years of follow-up*
ADR, adverse drug reaction.
*Data from Takeuchi, et al.1
Key learnings |
|
Subscribe to get the best content related to lupus delivered to your inbox