All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Lupus Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Lupus Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lupus Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lupus Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lupus Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through a grant from AstraZeneca. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
At the 14th European Lupus Meeting, Roy.1 presented safety findings from an ongoing phase Ib study of enpatoran by Wenzel et al.2 in patients with active SLE or cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE).1,2 Here, we summarize the key points.
This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-ascending trial (NCT04647708), exploring the maximal anticipated therapeutic range of oral enpatoran vs placebo in patients with active SLE/CLE (Figure 1).1,2
Figure 1. Study design*
CLASI, Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index; CLE, cutaneous lupus erythematosus; BID, twice-daily; SFU, safety follow-up; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SLEDAI-2K, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000.
*Adapted from Roy.1
†Cohort 4 was optional and was not activated.
This analysis was based on blinded data with a cut-off date of Aug 10, 2023.2
Out of 25 randomized patients, 20 completed treatment.
Two patients were undergoing treatment, while three had discontinued treatment due to reasons unrelated to safety.
Overall, 12 patients reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE; Figure 1).
93% of TEAEs were mild (n = 19) or moderate (n = 8) in severity.
One Grade 4 TEAE (laboratory abnormality of decreased lymphocyte count) was reported.
There were no instances of Grade 3 TEAEs, serious TEAEs, dose-limiting toxicities, adverse events of special interest, life-threatening TEAEs, or deaths (Figure 2).
No safety concerns were observed in the electroencephalogram and electroencephalogram findings.
No clinically significant abnormalities were noted in electrocardiogram readings.
All electroencephalogram results were within the normal limits.
Figure 2. Safety findings*
AE, adverse event; TEAE, treatment-emergent AE.
*Data from Roy.1
†Includes severe infections, seizures, serotonin syndrome, and clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias.
Key learnings |
|
Subscribe to get the best content related to lupus delivered to your inbox