All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The Lupus Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lupus Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lupus Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lupus Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Autolus, Biogen and Biogen MA, Inc. and UCB. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Telitacicept + SoC in proliferative LN: A real-world, retrospective study

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Sep 25, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in lupus nephritis.


Results from a real-world, retrospective study evaluating telitacicept, a dual inhibitor of B-cell activating factor (BAFF) and proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL), combined with standard of care (SoC; n = 56) vs SoC alone (n = 56) as induction therapy in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) were published in Lupus Science & Medicine by Tian et al. Proliferative LN was defined as International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) Class III/IV ± Class V. Endpoints included complete renal response (CR) rate, partial renal response (PR) rate, and no renal response (NR) rate. 

Key data: At Week 24, the telitacicept + SoC group achieved significantly higher CR (67.9% vs 39.3%; p = 0.004) and PR (83.9% vs 67.9%; p = 0.023) rates, and significantly lower NR rates (14.3% vs 32.1%; p = 0.044) vs SoC alone; a significant difference in CR (p < 0.001) was observed from Week 12. By Week 52, the CR rates were 84.1% vs 63.0% (p = 0.036), the PR rates were 93.2% vs 81.5%, and the NR rates were 6.8% vs 18.5% (p = 0.134) with telitacicept + SoC vs SoC alone. Multivariate Cox regression identified telitacicept as an independent predictor of CR (hazard ratio [HR], 4.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.25–8.73; p < 0.001). Median glucocorticoid (GC) dose was lower in the telitacicept + SoC vs SoC alone at Week 12 (20 mg/day vs 40 mg/day; p < 0.001), Week 24 (10 mg/day vs 25 mg/day; p < 0.001), and Week 52 (7.5 mg/day vs 10 mg/day; p < 0.001). Overall, 19.6% of patients receiving telitacicept + SoC experienced adverse events (AEs) vs 30.4% receiving SoC alone. 

Key learning: In a real-world study, adding telitacicept to SoC was associated with improved renal response rates and facilitated faster GC tapering during induction therapy in patients with proliferative LN, warranting further investigation. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content