All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.

The Lupus Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your Lupus Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The Lupus Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lupus Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lupus Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2024-02-23T17:35:16.000Z

Impact of mycophenolate mofetil discontinuation in patients with SLE

Feb 23, 2024
Share:
Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a commonly used immunosuppressant to treat systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis. However, long-term treatment with MMF increases the risk of adverse events, including infections and malignancies, requiring withdrawal following disease quiescence. Furthermore, the risks of MMF withdrawal are unclear.

Chakravarty et al. published an article in The Lancet Rheumatology,1 assessing the risks associated with MMF discontinuation vs maintenance in patients with quiescent SLE on long-term MMF. Here, we summarize the key findings.

Methods1

  • This was an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (NCT01946880).
  • Patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to MMF maintenance and withdrawal groups.
  • The primary endpoint was the probability of clinically significant disease reactivation by Week 60.
  • To evaluate non-inferiority, an estimation-based approach was used to calculate absolute increases in risk associated with MMF withdrawal, with one-sided upper 75%, 85%, and 95% confidence limits.

Key findings1

  • A total of 49 patients in the maintenance group and 51 patients in the withdrawal group were included in the modified intent-to-treat population.
    • Mean age was 42 years, 84% of patients were women, average MMF treatment duration was 6.6 years, and 76% of patients had a history of lupus nephritis.
  • MMF withdrawal led to a non-significant 7% increase in the risk of clinically significant disease reactivation by Week 60 (Figure 1A).
    • Mean time to clinically significant disease reactivation was 38 weeks for the MMF maintenance group and 38.5 weeks for the MMF withdrawal group.
  • Risk estimates for all other disease measures overlapped between maintenance and withdrawal groups (Figure 1A).
  • In the subgroup of patients with renal disease, point estimates and one-sided confidence limits for increases in risk with MMF withdrawal were higher compared with the modified intention-to-treat group (Figure 1B).

Figure 1. Increase in risk with MMF withdrawal at Week 60 in A modified intent-to-treat population, and
B
subset of patients with renal disease* 

BILAG, British Isles Lupus Assessment Group; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; SELENA-SLEDAI, Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index.
*Data from Chakravarty, et al.1

Safety

  • Adverse events were similar between groups; however, the MMF maintenance group reported more frequent infections and a shorter time to first infection compared with the withdrawal group (Table 1).
  • One pregnancy happened nine months post complete MMF withdrawal, with a full-term healthy infant.
  • No deaths were reported.

Table 1. AEs in the safety population*

Events, %

Maintenance cohort
(n = 50)

Withdrawal cohort
(n = 52)

Serious AEs

14

10

Total AEs

90

88

              Related to SLE

50

62

AE by severity

 

 

              Grade 1

0

2

              Grade 2

90

87

              Grade 3

20

21

              Grade 4

4

0

Total infections

64

46

Infections by severity

 

 

              Grade 2

60

46

              Grade 3

8

2

              Grade 4

0

0

AE, adverse event, SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.
*Data from Chakravarty, et al.1


Key learnings

  • MMF withdrawal is well tolerated and is not significantly inferior to MMF maintenance in patients with stable SLE.
  • However, patients and clinicians should be informed of the slight increase in flare risk. The risk estimates with 75%, 85%, and 95% confidence limits will facilitate informed decision making on MMF discontinuation.
  • Larger studies with a longer follow-up are needed.

  1. Chakravarty EF, Utset T, Kamen DL, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil withdrawal in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Rheumatol. 2024. Online ahead of print. DOI: 1016/S2665-9913(23)00320-X


Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to lupus delivered to your inbox