All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.
The Lupus Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lupus Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lupus Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lupus Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Autolus and Biogen. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View lupus content recommended for you
Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb study evaluating orelabrutinib in patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were presented by Li at the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) 2026 Congress, June 3–6, 2026, London, UK. A total of 187 patients were randomized to receive oral orelabrutinib 50 mg once daily (QD; n = 60), 75 mg QD (n = 63), or placebo (n = 64). The primary endpoint was the SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) response rate at Week 48.
Key data: At Week 48, a greater proportion of patients receiving orelabrutinib 75 mg vs placebo achieved SRI-4 responses (57.1% vs 34.4%; p = 0.01), with significant improvements observed from Week 20. A greater proportion of patients receiving orelabrutinib 75 mg vs placebo also achieved SRI-6 responses at Week 48 (44.4% vs 25.0%; p = 0.015), with significant improvements observed from Week 8. British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) responses also favored orelabrutinib 75 mg vs placebo at Week 48 (33.3% vs 15.6%; p = 0.011). Glucocorticoid dose reductions to ≤7.5 mg/day were achieved by a greater proportion of patients receiving orelabrutinib 75 mg vs placebo (71.1% vs 43.6%; p = 0.015). The safety profile of orelabrutinib was favorable and similar between the 50 mg and 75 mg groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 98.4% of patients receiving orelabrutinib 75 mg vs 90.6% of patients receiving placebo, with treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) reported in 19.0% vs 4.7% of patients.
Key learning: Orelabrutinib demonstrated significant reductions in disease activity and glucocorticoid dose at Week 48, with a manageable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe SLE.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content