The lupus Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lupus Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lupus and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lupus Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through a grant from AstraZeneca. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lupus content recommended for you
Belimumab inhibits B-cell activating factor and is approved for the treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis, alongside standard therapy, by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).1,2 However, the treatment can be ineffective for some patients.3 Telitacicept inhibits both B-cell activating factor and a proliferation-inducing ligand simultaneously and is approved in China for the treatment of active SLE.1,3
Below, we summarize the efficacy and safety of telitacicept in cases published by Fan et al. in Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie1 and Huang et al. in Lupus,3 where belimumab did not yield an adequate response.
For the case series by Fan et al., the records of patients diagnosed with SLE at the Wuhan Hospital of Chinese and Western Medicine, China, between March 2022 and July 2023, were assessed.
A total of 14 patients with refractory SLE were treated with telitacicept 160 mg (n = 7) and 80 mg (n = 7) after suboptimal response with belimumab plus standard therapy. The mean age was 32.9 years; 79% were female. Before telitacicept, five patients received ≥2 immunosuppressants, and all had discontinued belimumab for ≥6 months due to persistent and recurrent conditions and difficulty in tapering steroids.
Treatment with telitacicept for an average of 34.1 (17–62) weeks (observational endpoint) resulted in:
Figure 1. Reduction in A SLEDAI score, B PGA score, and C glucocorticoid use in patients receiving telitacicept after inadequate response with belimumab*
PGA, Physician Global Assessment; SLEDAI, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index.
*Data from Fan, et al.1
Figure 2 elucidates a case report, wherein SLE, unresponsive to ten doses of belimumab, was effectively controlled following a switch to telitacicept.
Figure 2. Clinical case overview of a 35-year-old female*
ANA, anti-nuclear antibody; CT, computed tomography; dsDNA, double-stranded DNA; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MP, methylprednisolone; WBC, white blood cell.
*Data from Huang, et al.2
Key learnings1,3 |
Telitacicept appears to be an effective and safe alternative treatment in patients with SLE who show inadequate response to belimumab. |
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content