All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional.

  TRANSLATE

The Lupus Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lupus Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lupus Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Lupus Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Autolus and Biogen. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Ianalumab in moderate-to-severe SLE: Phase II end-of-study results

By Amy Hopkins

Share:

Jul 10, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in systemic lupus erythematosus.


Results from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase II study (NCT03656562) evaluating ianalumab 300 mg subcutaneous (SC) every 4 weeks (QW4; n = 34) vs placebo (n = 33) in patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were presented by Edward M. Vital at the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) 2026 Congress, June 3–6, 2026, London, UK. Clinical outcomes at the end of study (EoS) after B-cell recovery were assessed.

Key data: At Week 28, a greater proportion of patients receiving ianalumab vs placebo achieved SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4; 44.1% vs 9.1%), Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS; 17.6% vs 9.1%), and Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS; 11.8% vs 3.0%). Response rates continued to increase over the open-label period (Weeks 29–52) in patients who continued ianalumab and those who switched from placebo to ianalumab for SRI-4 (45.5% and 40.6%), LLDAS (39.4% and 21.9%), and DORIS (27.3% and 12.5%). With a median time after end of treatment (EoT) of 44 weeks, efficacy persisted off treatment until B-cell recovery (LLDAS, 32.4% and 24.2%; DORIS, 26.5% and 15.2%). No new safety signals were identified, and no serious adverse events (SAEs) were considered related to ianalumab.

Key learning: Prolonged ianalumab therapy up to 1 year was associated with increased response rates in patients with SLE, with clinical benefits persisting following B-cell recovery, suggesting that long-term treatment with ianalumab provides durable clinical benefits. These findings warrant confirmation in larger clinical trials.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content