The lupus Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lupus Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lupus and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lupus Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through a grant from AstraZeneca. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lupus content recommended for you
Featured:
The Lupus Hub was pleased to speak to Manuel Ugarte-Gil, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru. We asked how effective is the Lupus Foundation of America Rapid Evaluation of Activity in Lupus (LFA-REAL) clinician-reported outcome in assessing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity.
LFA-REAL clinician-reported outcome as an effective disease activity measure for SLE
Ugarte-Gil initiates the discussion by evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of the existing disease activity indices, such as SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG), and Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA), emphasizing the need for more comprehensive, easy-to-use measures, and time-effective indices. Ugarte-Gil introduces a novel index, namely the LFA REAL clinician-reported outcome, which includes visual analogue scales for various organ domains and correlates with existing physician-based disease activity measures. He illustrates examples of patient scenarios, showcasing how different indices may yield varied assessments. He also introduces the LFA-REAL patient-reported outcome, aiming to incorporate patient perspectives on disease activity. While acknowledging the need to address inter-observer variation, he expresses optimism about the potential of the LFA-REAL clinician-reported outcome to enhance the evaluation of patients with SLE.