The lupus Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the lupus Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The lupus and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Lupus Hub is an independent medical education platform, supported through a grant from AstraZeneca. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View lupus content recommended for you
Since the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for Glomerular Diseases was updated in 2021,1 there have been advances in the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN), including the approval of belimumab and voclosporin by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) as add-on immunosuppressives to standard-of-care LN treatment.2
Recently, KDIGO has issued an evidence-based update on recommendations for managing LN, summarized by Rovin et al.2 in Kidney International. Here, we provide a summary of the guidelines.
An evidence review team updated the systematic evidence review, using their expertise in guideline development methodology, and a work group was established by KDIGO for writing recommendations and practice points. Then, following a public review and incorporating external feedback, the guidelines were finalized and published.
Recommendation statements were formulated for the general management of LN and the initial and maintenance therapy for active Class III/IV LN (Figure 1A). The practice points for all the classes of LN are outlined in Figure 1B.
Figure 1. A Recommendations and B practice points for management of patients with LN*
AZA, azathioprine; BEL, belimumab; BID, twice-daily; BP, blood pressure; CNI; calcineurin inhibitor; CYC, cyclophosphamide; d, day; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GC, glucocorticoid; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; IV, intravenous; IS, immunosuppressive; KDIGO, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes; LN, lupus nephritis; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MP, methylprednisolone; MPAA, mycophenolic acid analog; mo, month; p.o., oral administration; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q4W, every 4 weeks; RAS, renin-angiotensin system; RTX, rituximab; SCr, serum creatinine; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; TAC, tacrolimus; VOC, voclosporin.
*Adapted from Rovin, et al.2; KDIGO Lupus Nephritis Work Group.3
†The certainty of evidence was graded on a scale of A to D, indicating high to very-low certainty, respectively, and recommendations were graded as Level 1 (“we recommend”) or Level 2 (“we suggest”).
Treat pediatric patients with LN using immunosuppression regimens similar to those used in adults, while accounting for factors such as dose adjustment, growth, fertility, and psychosocial factors when planning therapy.
Key learnings |
The key update in the 2024 KDIGO guidelines is the recommendations for the initial treatment of patients with active Class III/IV ± V LN, which involves using glucocorticoids alongside low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide or mycophenolic acid analogs (dual immunosuppressive therapy). Alternatively, belimumab or voclosporin (or tacrolimus) can be added (triple immunosuppressive therapy). |
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content